Had econs paper today. Can say its quite manageable in view that im able to do all the questions. Its not like phy geo where i can totally leave a question out. Alright, shall not rumble on it. Jus do well for tml's paper, more logical.

Dunno if i still have the strength to chiong for tml's paper, looking at the condition of my right hand. haha. Lets put it this way, if u see a student fling her hand after she finishes every paper, u will noe she's a arts student. Not trying to be exaggerate but seriously, my right hand was aching after the paper. Sounds so old=p There's jus too much to write for econs, and geo as well. Its not like lit where we are to focus more on the techniques and analysis and not so much on the content. For econs n geo, its 2-way. U need the content as well as the application= write like mad. I felt so restless during the 2nd paper that i feel like smashing my pen and drop. Sounds so violent=p
There's one moment when my hand jus refuse to go on. Can u imagine how i feel when i have so much tings in my mind but i jus couldn't let the markers noe i noe! so much to write n so so little time. Are they trying to test how fast students can write? But the fact that we think faster than our hand can write and we can see our marks flying away when the examiner says stop writing. Simply not enough time pls... But for lit, one hr per question is really jus nice. with 15mins for planning n analysing, there's still enough time to complete the whole paper. They're looking more on the quality and not so much on the quantity even though u still need to meet a minimum requirement. Yes, thats the way. Giving students sufficient time to write down all that she/he noes for that particular question. Isn't it wat they wan? OR wat they wan is to see how much a student can write within the time limit and make comparison with the rest of the students=_= and have our future and capability determined by that 1.5hr paper.

How fair.

I Wish Upon a Star on Tuesday, March 20, 2007